Forum

Posted: 15 Nov 2009 14:05      quote | report

well perhaps I did take her park but I didn't see her sitting waiting for it on the other side of the road and to be fair it's not like the extra exercise was going to do her any harm.

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 11:50      quote | report

Dear Tech Support,
I need your computer advice as a friend is having trouble with his system.

Last year he upgraded to Girlfriend 1.0 from Drinking Mates 4.2 which he'd used for years without trouble.
However, apparently there are conflicts between these two systems, the only solution was to try and run Girlfriend with the sound turned off, but to make matters worse, Girlfriend 1.0 is incompatible with several other applications, such as; Lads Night Out 3.1,Golf 2 and Playboy 6.0.

Successive versions of Girlfriend proved no better, Girlfriend 3.0 has many Bugs and left a virus in his system, forcing him to shut down completely for several weeks.
Eventually he tried installing Girlfriend 2.1 as well as Girlfriend 1.0 only to discover when these two systems detected each other they caused severe damage to all his hardware.

Sensing a way out, he upgraded to Fiancee. 1.0 only to discover to his dismay that this system requires rapid upgrading to Wife 1.0. However, whilst Wife 1.0 uses up all available resources it does come bundled with FreeSexPlus and Cleanhouse 2000. But imagine my friends disappointment on discovering that not only can Wife 1.0 be unstable and costly to maintain, but also that any mistakes he makes are automatically stored in Wife 1.0 Hardrive and can not be deleted. They then re-surface months later .

Wife 1.0 also has an automatic InterDiary Explorer and E-mail Porn Filter, and automatically runs UltraSTROP and WINGE.zip. No option on the Help menu seems to work, leaving him to try and guess the fault himself.
The system footprint needs updating regularly requiring Shoeshop browserPro for new attachments - Hairstyle express needs to be reinstalled every week.
It also refused some of the new Games and attachments he wanted to try, stating they are an Illegal operation. When Wife 1.0 attaches itself to Car 1.0 it often crashes or runs the system dry. Wife 1.0 also has a rather annoying pop-up called Mother-in-Law, which can't be turned off.

Recently he's been tempted to try Mistress Millennium add-on, but we have heard there could be problems. If wife 1.0 detects the presence of mistress 2000, it will delete all MS Money files before un-installing itself.
Is this a common problem?

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 12:05      quote | report

what do u reckon this would be like as a learn to surf surboard?


very cheap...am tempted.

http://www.1-day.co.nz/products/AA7JCN97S# [1-day.co.nz]

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 12:15      quote | report

it's $150. you get what you pay for...

Originally posted by: DavidC
..Wife 1.0 also has a rather annoying pop-up called Mother-in-Law, which can't be turned off...

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 12:18      quote | report

But for learning on is pretty good for that price.

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 12:20      quote | report

*edited 19 Nov 2009 12:21

Originally posted by: Freshie
what do u reckon this would be like as a learn to surf surboard?


very cheap...am tempted.

http://www.1-day.co.nz/products/AA7JCN97S# [1-day.co.nz]

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 12:43      quote | report

well i bought it..went for the 8footer..even if it isnt great..should be able to flick if off easily enough.

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 12:47      quote | report

Good on ya Freshie.

Posted: 19 Nov 2009 17:58      quote | report

ill tell you whats farkin random and thats spies on acid breaking into apartments and licking up yogurt

Posted: 20 Nov 2009 18:02      quote | report

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onD0-KERVEk [youtube.com]

some slamming shories at Chersil beach UK which i visited recently..was about 6 ft at the time.

Posted: 20 Nov 2009 18:07      quote | report

*edited 12 May 2010 12:25
looks like matata on a stormy day at lowtide, thats pretty fresh duude..

Posted: 22 Nov 2009 20:53      quote | report

Anyone else growing facial hair this month. 9 days till I can shave it off, mixed reviews mostly positive surprisingly but it's annoying the heck out of me.

Posted: 22 Nov 2009 21:02      quote | report

Originally posted by: Father Ted

Anyone else growing facial hair this month.

.

Posted: 22 Nov 2009 21:05      quote | report

Posted: 24 Nov 2009 12:07      quote | report

Wedding Anniversary today - Been married for 19 years today

Posted: 24 Nov 2009 12:16      quote | report

well done. goes fast ae?

i just shaved my beard off. had a deal with mrs, she hates the fuzz and i didn't like her chewing her nails...so i grew the beard and she grew her nails lol. but then i kinda liked the beard, but had to stick to the deal. starting to grow it all over again. now i need another deal to get rid of it....hmmmm..

Posted: 24 Nov 2009 12:31      quote | report

well done. goes fast ae?

just shaved my beard off

Posted: 24 Nov 2009 13:55      quote | report

Has work forgoten about the complaint made against you spending far too much time on the surfco forum blunt?

Posted: 24 Nov 2009 14:54      quote | report

If it aint blocked by webmarshal its all good

Posted: 24 Nov 2009 16:30      quote | report

hmm well after just getting back from my 1st surf at piha in sometime rather disappointed, certain surf photographers who reckoned it was going to be alright have been taken off the christmas card list still a surf to break up the working day cant be sniffed at

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 14:31      quote | report

HUNTER PRODUCTIONS LTD
Keith Hunter, Director.
_______________________________________________________________________________
P.O. BOX 46 115 HERNE BAY AUCKLAND 1147 NEW ZEALAND
TELEPHONE (64-9) 360 5020; FACSIMILE (64 -9) 360 5022
Email: keith@hunterproductions.co.nz Website: www.hunterproductions.co.nz


A Note to Readers of Trial By Trickery,
on the Justice Sytem’s next corrupt treatment of Scott Watson:

Re: The Aristocracy Confirmed


In October 2008 Scott Watson petitioned the Governor General for a pardon. He included copies of Trial By Trickery and Murder on The Blade? with his petition as the doc-umentation providing grounds for it. The Governor General passed the application to the Minister of Justice, who in April appointed a QC to inquire into the case and provide an advisory report on it. This note relates to that appointment and its present outcome.

Everyone familiar with my book or film will be aware that it is crucial for the inquiry to address the conduct of several high-ranking members of the New Zealand justice system. Saving the late Richard Heron, all of these people have been invited to explain their conduct as described in the book. None has taken the opportunity and their silence can convey only the obvious meaning. They are the present Deputy Commissioner of Police (Rob Pope), the Crown Prosecutors Davison, Crutchley and Raftery, trial judge the late Justice Heron, and the three judges of the Court of Appeal, Richardson, Gault and Henry. The first requirement of the inquiry is therefore that it must be conducted by a qualified person who has no prior association with any of these people. Any lawyer with any of the following backgrounds must be disqualified from appointment:
• A history as a Crown Prosecutor or association with the Crown Law Office in Wellington. This is particularly relevant since at the time of Watson’s trial until 2006 prosecutor Nicola Crutchley was the Deputy Solicitor General (Criminal), the Crown Law official whose function was to approve and appoint Crown Prosecutors;
• An obvious relationship with the police, particularly with its upper echelons.
• A connection with Christchuch legal circles in the 1980’s and 1990’s, since Deputy Commissioner of Police Rob Pope spent all of his early career as a policeman there.

Obviously no lawyer at all can report on the conduct of the Court of Appeal except to find that the conduct needs address by a superior process.


The lawyer Minister Simon Power appointed to conduct the inquiry into Scott Watson’s conviction is Ms Kristy McDonald QC.

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 14:33      quote | report

cont...


• Ms McDonald has been a crown prosecutor for almost 30 years, starting in Christchurch in the 1980s. It is reasonable to assume that she prosecuted cases in that city brought by Mr Pope and that they have an association going back to that time.
• Ms McDonald is still a Crown Prosecutor. Now she is in Wellington, where she has continual contact with the Crown Law Office. From the mid-nineties to 2006, each time she was appointed prosecutor to a criminal case her appointment was made by Deputy Solicitor General Nicola Crutchley and she was responsible to the Crown Law Office as her employer. It would be remarkable if Ms McDonald avoided a close professional and personal relationship with Ms Crutchley during the years of their association as Crown Prosecutors and as employer and employee in the same city.
• Another of Ms McDonald’s major employers is the Police Force. She has acted as counsel for the police for many years and conducts internal inquiries for them. In 2004 she acted as counsel for the police in a major public inquiry. She has acted as counsel to the Commissioner of Police.
• It is impossible for Ms McDonald not to have an ongoing personal and/or professional association with Deputy Commisssioner Pope dating back perhaps twenty-five years, and impossible for her to have no bond with the institution of the Police. There is no QC in New Zealand who has greater access to, association with, and both personal and professional links with the upper echelons of the police than Ms McDonald. There is no QC in New Zealand who might better be described as a ‘police lawyer’ than Ms McDonald.
• Ms McDonald has other government appointments. She has chaired the Mental Health Review Tribunal and was a member of the Removal Review Authority. In 2008 she was appointed chairwoman of the Judicial Control Authority for Racing. Just four weeks before awarding her the Watson inquiry the Minister appointed her chair of the Real Estate Agents Authority. It would appear that there are few “independent” lawyers in New Zealand more obliged to the “System” for lucrative employment than Ms McDonald. She appears to be a political pet .

The appointment is cynical in the extreme. Barrring Paul Davison, there is no QC in New Zealand more ineligible for this inquiry than Ms McDonald.

There are also personal qualities required for the inquiry. The first is transparent and unimpeachable integrity. Ms McDonald fails this criterion immediately. When she accepted an appointment that she patently should have declined she put personal ambition, personal associations and personal obligations ahead of personal integrity.





cont...

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 14:37      quote | report

The “Yes Minister” television series described this process well. When a commission of inquiry is needed, a “sound man” is appointed to run it, the object being to acquire a safe, predetermined outcome. Here we have a perfect example. Ms McDonald’s commission is to protect the elite and to hide the issues that need to be exposed. She is to provide a fitting end to the whole process. Her commission is to cap a corrupt police investigation, a corrupt trial and a corrupt appeal hearing with a corrupt inquiry.

Any fears that Ms McDonald’s inquiry was a set-up have now proven well founded. Three weeks ago she advised the Minister of the issues she has identified for her inquiry. Not one relates to the conduct of the figures listed above. The ruse she has come up with is to confine the inquiry to events capable of interpretation as having occurred after the trial.

So the blatantly crooked and unfair trial and appeal are to be ignored - and with it Pope’s perfidy, his collusion with the journalist Brett to prevent a fair trial, his lies and their pretrial contamination of a trial judge who should have disqualified himself from taking the case, the raft of outright lies by the prosecutors and Court of Appeal, and the deliberate concealment by the prosecutors of their two trip theory with the specific intention of perverting justice. Ms McDonald’s pretence is either that none of these occurred or that none is relevant to Scott Watson’s conviction or to his petition. Only “new evidence” is relevant.

For a first world country in the 21st century the rort is monstrous. The primary focus of my book and film, the two publications detailing the grounds for the petition, is the corruption of our criminal justice system by elite officials who are plainly devoid of integrity. Pope, Crutchley, Davison, Raftery, Heron, Richardson, Gault and Henry, each the recipient of several hundred thousand dollars per year from the public purse and entrusted to act honourably in the interests of justice, are all guilty of criminal behaviour which would put any other New Zealand citizen in prison for many years. Their behaviour is to be ignored. McDonald QC is under instruction to look the other way. They are too special and so each of them is to be put above the law.

There are presently two newsworthy parallels. One is in a country few New Zealanders would look to as a model of integrity - France: “ ‘ We must not give the impression that there is a gap between the protected elites and the little people.’ Most of France agreed but Sarkosy was furious..” reported the NZ Herald three weeks ago, in the context of a politician upsetting her president in a nepotism scandal.

cont..

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 14:40      quote | report

cont..


There are presently two newsworthy parallels. One is in a country few New Zealanders would look to as a model of integrity - France: “ ‘ We must not give the impression that there is a gap between the protected elites and the little people.’ Most of France agreed but Sarkosy was furious..” reported the NZ Herald three weeks ago, in the context of a politician upsetting her president in a nepotism scandal.

Clearly the Minister thought it advantageous if he were seen to proclaim the same taste for equality in law. And so just last week the Herald’s front page reported that he “wants to stop the emerging “special class” of high profile people using their status to get name suppression.. Mr Power said he “instinctively disagreed with giving well known people an advantage when they became before the courts..” in the context of suppressing the name of a entertainer convicted of indecent asault.

The Minister’s concern for equality in our courts is false. While he talks of ensuring high profile entertainers are not given advantage, his intentions towards his high profile mates in the legal apparatus are the opposite. And he is not just talking about it. He is actually putting into practice a protection scheme for a special class of New Zealanders who are to be immune from the courts. He is going to line New Zealand up alongside Fiji as a banana republic in which the forces of justice are directed only at the little people and do not apply to his new upper class. We are to be a two tiered society, the privileged and the subject, the aristocracy and the commoners. This is the old world social structure that New Zealand’s European forebears left behind a hundred and fifty years ago.

The egregious Mr Power must be stopped and his corrupt associates made responsible to the same laws they themselves impose on everyone else. It’s not as if he is unaware of the issues. When the book was first published in 2007 he emailed twice seeking a meeting with me to discuss its revelations. Then as he looked to become the Minister of Justice his interest in justice began to subside. Then he became Minister and his interest in justice vanished.

In 2003 I produced Murder On The Blade? and naively assumed it would attract the attention of our Justice System. It didn’t. So I spent a further two years researching and writing a book on the case and in March 2007 published Trial By Trickery. I would not have believed that almost three years later Scott Watson would still be in prison and that there was a further step the System could take to demonstrate that it is bereft of integrity.

cont..

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 14:52      quote | report

cont..

Now I have a better grasp of the depth and extent of the corruption involved, not just in Watson but throughout the “System”. I believe that Scott Watson’s story should be as widely known as possible, both in and outside New Zealand, first to obstruct the Minister’s intention to sideline his duty to us all, but fundamentally to build a demand for a full and proper public inquiry into the administration of justice in New Zealand.

If you agree with this please find a way to make others aware of the scam about to be pulled. My suggestions are these:

• Write to your local MP, to the Minister of Justice, to the Prime Minister, to the Governor General, and advise them that the steps they are taking are unacceptable:
• Talk to your friends and colleagues about it;
• Direct people to the websites that address these issues: freescotthingyson.com; trialbytrickery.com;
• Consider Trial by Trickery and/or Murder On the Blade? when you come to consider Christmas gifts,
• Google Scott Watson or Trial by Trickery and take part in the web discussions that are constantly under way,
• Forward this message to your email contacts and ask them to circulate it too.

I welcome any other suggestion as to how the truth of The Queen against Scott Watson might reach every New Zealander so that everyone knows what quality of justice we have. Principle is irrelevant to Mr Power and those like him. The only forces capable of forestalling his planned false report, and of ensuring punishment for those who should be punished and freedom to those who should not, are public knowledge and public pressure..


Keith Hunter
26 November 09

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 14:59      quote | report

*edited 27 Nov 2009 15:12

•Watch your mouth! The words "c-m" are not allowed here.


oh c um'mon...the word was d o c u men t a t i o n

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 15:04      quote | report

I'll have a word to Matt about the profanity filter.

Posted: 27 Nov 2009 15:06      quote | report

*edited 27 Nov 2009 15:11
cheers B

Posted: 28 Nov 2009 20:10      quote | report

good stuff seeka....we only have a justice system in this country for people who have the $$$.

Posted: 29 Nov 2009 10:17      quote | report

*edited 29 Nov 2009 11:49
I have been teaching surf lesson's the last two days due to the fishing work being a bit slow. Teaching surfing is quite possibly the worst job I have ever done apart from pushing hot canadians into waves in 28c water

I did manage to release a 6-700lb black marlin on tuesday so its been a fun week

Posted: 29 Nov 2009 11:52      quote | report

try pushing rods down a sewer line now thats not fun

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 8:23      quote | report

just a few questions...picked up a board like this recently

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Sports/Surfing/Surfboards/Longboards/auction-256394229.htm [trademe.co.nz]

and was wondering whther u can put deck grip on it as it is sort of foamy on top.

also for a 7ft board do u need a 7 foot leg rope?

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 8:37      quote | report

My minimals 7ft and I use a normal length leash.

Dunno if deckgrip will stick to it. Does it even need it if the boards got a foam type deck? May already be sticky enough.

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 9:01      quote | report

well board is 8ft..do i need 8ft leash or will 7ft or less do?

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 9:04      quote | report

stick to the booger kook

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 9:08      quote | report

speak for yourself BC.

Blunt its not spongy like a booger.
I think deck grip will stick. I see a whole lot of grips on hyper.co.nz but with low, medium or high arch..which do u reckon i need?

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 9:14      quote | report

I'm perhaps not the best to ask re-deck grip as I'm a wax guy ... no deckgrip on my stick. If arch is referring to how much lift the grip has I'd go for low.

Re your 7ft leash ... should be sweet as I reckon.

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 9:38      quote | report

well i got an 8ft leash off hyper for $24

i think ill pass on the deck grip for the moment, but am looking for an 8ft board bag is anyone knows where i can get one cheap..new or second hand, base model will do.

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 9:44      quote | report

Originally posted by: bionic chronic
stick to the booger kook

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 12:42      quote | report

well i got an 8ft leash off hyper for $24

i think ill pass on the deck grip for the moment, but am looking for an 8ft board bag is anyone knows where i can get one cheap..new or second hand, base model will do.

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 12:51      quote | report

well bodyboards tend to invert if left in the sun..sort of melt and go all bendy..im guessing a soft top would do the same, thou i may be wrong.

Supposedly the board was worth $400 new. Any idea what those board socks are like? Seen some for $60 on net

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 13:53      quote | report

Socks are ok but don't really offer much 'ding' protection. Probably good enough for a softie tho.

well bodyboards tend to invert if left in the sun

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 14:26      quote | report

Is this board for your Freshie.... I thought you were well beyond the soft top stage?

I would get aboard bag if only to cover the monstrosity up...theres a dude on trademe selling bags for around $85

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 15:04      quote | report

would get aboard bag if only to cover the monstrosity up

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 16:24      quote | report

Originally posted by: lost
*edited 29 Nov 2009 11:49

I did manage to release a 6-700lb black marlin on tuesday so its been a fun week

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 16:35      quote | report

Blunt if u have it on your roofrack its gonna get sun on it..unless u go on cold rainy days only.

i dont think dings should be too much of a problem with a soft board.

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 17:03      quote | report

..this has to be a wind up

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 17:45      quote | report

why are u defending wavefairy sirfer? are u him?

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 18:49      quote | report

well its good for learning on 2020.
Do u put wax/deck grip on soft tops by the way? i read somewhere u didnt need for Solid brand boards.

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 20:00      quote | report

you dont need to but can help much like a body board can pay to use colder wax so it goes on better

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 21:00      quote | report

deck grip or wax u reckon?

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 21:22      quote | report

Wax, you don't need deck grip

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 21:26      quote | report

Yup I agree. I'd be surprised if deck even stuck to a softtop.

Posted: 30 Nov 2009 22:48      quote | report

cheers lads

Posted: 01 Dec 2009 12:37      quote | report

I can't believe all the fuss over Tiger Woods and his car accident. Its a media frenzy. Ok so he is the worlds premier sports person and is squeeky clean but FFS all did was hit a tree. I acn't evenm believe his next door neighbour called the cops. He would have been better off whipping out his digital camera and snapping a few shots of Elin Woods smashing the car window with Tigers 3 iron.

The news last night was showing pics of some Aussie skank who TW was suppose to have had an affair with while he was in Aus playing and winning the Aussie Golf Open. Why would you?

Elin Woods

Posted: 01 Dec 2009 12:43      quote | report

No Tiger ... NO

Posted: 01 Dec 2009 12:47      quote | report

Give up That ^^^

for this

Posted: 03 Dec 2009 20:48      quote | report

Just heard an ad on the radio for wavebox, saying an exclusive preview coming soon....

Posted: 03 Dec 2009 22:20      quote | report

Sign by Danasoft - I have my eye on you

Posted: 04 Dec 2009 5:54      quote | report

Originally posted by: Freshie
Just heard an ad on the radio for wavebox, saying an exclusive preview coming soon....