Forum


 

28

ISOmag Issue 3

ISOmag
send pm

Posted: 01 Sep 2010 19:53      quote | report

Hi fellas,
The new issue of online New Zealand bodyboarding magazine, ISOmag, has just gone live. Check it out at www.isomag.co.nz.

If you can look past all the shots of lidders/gut sliders/esky lidders/cripples/shark biscuits, we reckon you'll see the best empty wave and lineup shots that NZ has to offer. Enjoy!

 

dmand
send pm

Posted: 01 Sep 2010 20:09      quote | report

some great photos indeed


--------------------------------
#??? of SUB1000
 

Spud
send pm

Posted: 01 Sep 2010 21:00      quote | report

Sweet mag. Some great shots. Keep up the good work.


--------------------------------
Commodore Spud, Second in command to the Commander in Chief of the Sub 1000 armed forces. Sub 1000 committee secretary. Possibly the head of the Sub 1000 Secret Police. Former Surf.Co Official Rark Judge.
 

SNAP
send pm

Posted: 01 Sep 2010 21:08      quote | report

sick photos throughout.

i agree with the cal that the hawkes bay is underated


--------------------------------
SNAP awards
 

tubenet
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 7:26      quote | report

Really sick issue!!! Love all the insane barrel shots and empties.


--------------------------------
MR.SPEAKER & SUB-1000 MEMBER 4 LIFE
 

nelson77
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 7:30      quote | report

Its awesome how BC makes the whole thing out of his bedroom too!!


--------------------------------
Roll it in flour and look for the wet spot.
 

bionic chronic
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 10:37      quote | report

i got nothing to do with it

 

John_Rutter
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 11:53      quote | report

whatever

 

dumbbell
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 12:05      quote | report

Originally posted by: bionic chronic
i got nothing to do with it

Yeah they just print your name in it for shts aye? This is better as a web-publication than anything I've seen from standups in NZ. +1 for the knacker bashers.

 

bionic chronic
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 12:08      quote | report

oh so they did. Weird considering I haven't contributed to the last few issues.

 

dumbbell
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 14:06      quote | report

Your coolness emanates, and they knew if they included your name they'd get extra kudos and respect. Right, that's it, I'm going to start namedropping 'J R' in all my sht.

 

bionic chronic
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 14:15      quote | report

you remind me of this clip

http://www.turbosurfdesigns.com.au/index.php#podcast-joker [turbosurfdesigns.com.au]

 

tubenet
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 18:58      quote | report

Kingy = dead set legend


--------------------------------
MR.SPEAKER & SUB-1000 MEMBER 4 LIFE
 

Spud
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:14      quote | report

One thing I find a bit irritating with this mag is how guys are claiming to have "discovered" spots. I can pick out at least two "newly discovered" spots that I have surfed on a reasonably regular basis for at least 15 years. One of them in particular has been surfed for at least 30 years. Just because nobody was there the first time you surfed it doesn't mean you discovered it! Another thing that gets my goat a bit is saying that guys are "dominating" a certain break. I say just let the photos do the talking. Most of those guys are obviously going hard so why the need to make such disrespectful claims?

Apart from that it's a great mag that sh1ts on the stand-up publications in this country. Also big ups for them not actually saying where the lesser known spots are.


--------------------------------
Commodore Spud, Second in command to the Commander in Chief of the Sub 1000 armed forces. Sub 1000 committee secretary. Possibly the head of the Sub 1000 Secret Police. Former Surf.Co Official Rark Judge.
 

seeka
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:27      quote | report

great pics!
the mag named one spot and i'm fairly sure it's not in the guides(that i've seen).
one slight criticism i have is the text on pics is sometimes hard to read, a combo of dark text running into dark b/g or white running into light b/g. this could be solved by using an outline on the text..and maybe have the text(on pics) a bit bigger? maybe my eye is starting to fail?

good effort though.cheers for the link.


--------------------------------
XXIst sentry scribe
 

bionic chronic
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:41      quote | report

just click on the pic and it zooms in lol

Spud, I don't see any problem, I don't know what you are talking about quite frankly.

 

Spud
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:43      quote | report

Originally posted by: bionic chronic
just click on the pic and it zooms in lol

Spud, I don't see any problem, I don't know what you are talking about quite frankly.


Okay.


--------------------------------
Commodore Spud, Second in command to the Commander in Chief of the Sub 1000 armed forces. Sub 1000 committee secretary. Possibly the head of the Sub 1000 Secret Police. Former Surf.Co Official Rark Judge.
 

seeka
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:44      quote | report

yeah, i clicked 'full screen' to start with..must be my eye.


--------------------------------
XXIst sentry scribe
 

Spud
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:45      quote | report

I found it hard to read the writing as well. Didn't really bother me since the photos are so good.


--------------------------------
Commodore Spud, Second in command to the Commander in Chief of the Sub 1000 armed forces. Sub 1000 committee secretary. Possibly the head of the Sub 1000 Secret Police. Former Surf.Co Official Rark Judge.
 

bionic chronic
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:54      quote | report

*edited 03 Sep 2010 19:56
You can zoom in even more you know seeka

 

jelly
send pm

Posted: 03 Sep 2010 19:56      quote | report

nice waves

 

seeka
send pm

Posted: 04 Sep 2010 9:03      quote | report

all good, i put on my text enlarging specs.


--------------------------------
XXIst sentry scribe
 

bionic chronic
send pm

Posted: 04 Sep 2010 11:01      quote | report

click it seeker or use the bar to select what enlargement you want, like talking to a really old person.

 

seeka
send pm

Posted: 04 Sep 2010 11:46      quote | report


--------------------------------
XXIst sentry scribe
 

tubenet
send pm

Posted: 05 Sep 2010 9:36      quote | report

*edited 05 Sep 2010 09:37

Originally posted by: Spud
One thing I find a bit irritating with this mag is how guys are claiming to have "discovered" spots. I can pick out at least two "newly discovered" spots that I have surfed on a reasonably regular basis for at least 15 years. One of them in particular has been surfed for at least 30 years. Just because nobody was there the first time you surfed it doesn't mean you discovered it! Another thing that gets my goat a bit is saying that guys are "dominating" a certain break. I say just let the photos do the talking. Most of those guys are obviously going hard so why the need to make such disrespectful claims?

Apart from that it's a great mag that sh1ts on the stand-up publications in this country. Also big ups for them not actually saying where the lesser known spots are.

That's because you're a local legend. And I mean that in the most serious manner.

Picture this situation - you may have surfed those spots for years, but because they're so secret or out-of-the-way that the times they have surfed it, you haven't been there, or vice versa.

Think of it as a little bit of payback - I'm pretty sure a lot of standup mags across the world have claimed a few spots as their own or having "discovered them" as you say, with some even taken by force (e.g. "Ours"). Nothing to get too worked up about tho spuddie.


--------------------------------
MR.SPEAKER & SUB-1000 MEMBER 4 LIFE
 

bionic chronic
send pm

Posted: 05 Sep 2010 11:38      quote | report

*edited 05 Sep 2010 14:05
spud rips the pit

 

Spud
send pm

Posted: 05 Sep 2010 15:00      quote | report

Originally posted by: tubenet
*edited 05 Sep 2010 09:37
Originally posted by: Spud
One thing I find a bit irritating with this mag is how guys are claiming to have "discovered" spots. I can pick out at least two "newly discovered" spots that I have surfed on a reasonably regular basis for at least 15 years. One of them in particular has been surfed for at least 30 years. Just because nobody was there the first time you surfed it doesn't mean you discovered it! Another thing that gets my goat a bit is saying that guys are "dominating" a certain break. I say just let the photos do the talking. Most of those guys are obviously going hard so why the need to make such disrespectful claims?

Apart from that it's a great mag that sh1ts on the stand-up publications in this country. Also big ups for them not actually saying where the lesser known spots are.

That's because you're a local legend. And I mean that in the most serious manner.

Picture this situation - you may have surfed those spots for years, but because they're so secret or out-of-the-way that the times they have surfed it, you haven't been there, or vice versa.

Think of it as a little bit of payback - I'm pretty sure a lot of standup mags across the world have claimed a few spots as their own or having "discovered them" as you say, with some even taken by force (e.g. "Ours"). Nothing to get too worked up about tho spuddie.


Fair enough brother Tubenet. By the way, when are you coming down here so I can show you some of my spots?


--------------------------------
Commodore Spud, Second in command to the Commander in Chief of the Sub 1000 armed forces. Sub 1000 committee secretary. Possibly the head of the Sub 1000 Secret Police. Former Surf.Co Official Rark Judge.
 

tubenet
send pm

Posted: 06 Sep 2010 7:27      quote | report

Not sure, I've just started a new job so holiday leave isn't available for another year and I'll be in the BOP over xmas.

One day...


--------------------------------
MR.SPEAKER & SUB-1000 MEMBER 4 LIFE
 
 

Login or Register to comment on this topic.